<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Gini Coefficient: Income Inequality Around The Globe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weakonomics.com/2010/01/26/the-gini-coefficient-income-inequality-around-the-globe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weakonomics.com/2010/01/26/the-gini-coefficient-income-inequality-around-the-globe/</link>
	<description>Everything That&#039;s Wrong With You And Your Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2010/01/26/the-gini-coefficient-income-inequality-around-the-globe/comment-page-1/#comment-6045</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3742#comment-6045</guid>
		<description>Alan Greenspan admitted to US GINI of .49 as of his Congressional Hearing in 2009 about the financial crisis (looting) on Wall Street </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Greenspan admitted to US GINI of .49 as of his Congressional Hearing in 2009 about the financial crisis (looting) on Wall Street</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FredHead</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2010/01/26/the-gini-coefficient-income-inequality-around-the-globe/comment-page-1/#comment-6039</link>
		<dc:creator>FredHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3742#comment-6039</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your nice information, </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your nice information,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2010/01/26/the-gini-coefficient-income-inequality-around-the-globe/comment-page-1/#comment-5699</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3742#comment-5699</guid>
		<description>You miss the point.  The GINI index does not measure whether the rich gets richer.  In a way, it is measuring whether everybody is getting to benefit as well.  

In your example, if indeed the rich gets richer and they indeed invested in business that employ people, the index would not go up.  But, if they took the money and just hoarded it (or used it to invest in another country), thus not hiring anybody, the index would go up. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You miss the point.  The GINI index does not measure whether the rich gets richer.  In a way, it is measuring whether everybody is getting to benefit as well.  </p>
<p>In your example, if indeed the rich gets richer and they indeed invested in business that employ people, the index would not go up.  But, if they took the money and just hoarded it (or used it to invest in another country), thus not hiring anybody, the index would go up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2010/01/26/the-gini-coefficient-income-inequality-around-the-globe/comment-page-1/#comment-5674</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3742#comment-5674</guid>
		<description>Inflation benefits the wealthy (who can afford property and stocks) but 
hurts the rest who can&#039;t. This is one of the major causes of widening 
gap between the rich and the poor. 


&quot;Someone  is always the first to possess the new money and 
the first to be able  to spend it. These first beneficiaries are the 
inflation winners—they  enjoy an incalculable advantage, for they can 
make purchases on the  market at old prices, before the new demand 
drives prices higher.  However, those who are last in line to get the 
new money are the  inflation losers, forced to pay much higher prices.&quot; --  Claus Vogt, The Global Debt Trap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inflation benefits the wealthy (who can afford property and stocks) but<br />
hurts the rest who can&#8217;t. This is one of the major causes of widening<br />
gap between the rich and the poor. </p>
<p>&#8220;Someone  is always the first to possess the new money and<br />
the first to be able  to spend it. These first beneficiaries are the<br />
inflation winners—they  enjoy an incalculable advantage, for they can<br />
make purchases on the  market at old prices, before the new demand<br />
drives prices higher.  However, those who are last in line to get the<br />
new money are the  inflation losers, forced to pay much higher prices.&#8221; &#8212;  Claus Vogt, The Global Debt Trap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2010/01/26/the-gini-coefficient-income-inequality-around-the-globe/comment-page-1/#comment-5675</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3742#comment-5675</guid>
		<description>Inflation benefits the wealthy (who can afford property and stocks) but 
hurts the rest who can&#039;t. This is one of the major causes of widening 
gap between the rich and the poor. 


&quot;Someone  is always the first to possess the new money and 
the first to be able  to spend it. These first beneficiaries are the 
inflation winners—they  enjoy an incalculable advantage, for they can 
make purchases on the  market at old prices, before the new demand 
drives prices higher.  However, those who are last in line to get the 
new money are the  inflation losers, forced to pay much higher prices.&quot; --  Claus Vogt, The Global Debt Trap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inflation benefits the wealthy (who can afford property and stocks) but<br />
hurts the rest who can&#8217;t. This is one of the major causes of widening<br />
gap between the rich and the poor. </p>
<p>&#8220;Someone  is always the first to possess the new money and<br />
the first to be able  to spend it. These first beneficiaries are the<br />
inflation winners—they  enjoy an incalculable advantage, for they can<br />
make purchases on the  market at old prices, before the new demand<br />
drives prices higher.  However, those who are last in line to get the<br />
new money are the  inflation losers, forced to pay much higher prices.&#8221; &#8212;  Claus Vogt, The Global Debt Trap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Johnson</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2010/01/26/the-gini-coefficient-income-inequality-around-the-globe/comment-page-1/#comment-5673</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3742#comment-5673</guid>
		<description>Inflation has a lot to do with it as the new money reaches the 1% first, which gives them an incalculable advantage over those who see the new money much later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inflation has a lot to do with it as the new money reaches the 1% first, which gives them an incalculable advantage over those who see the new money much later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: income instrument</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2010/01/26/the-gini-coefficient-income-inequality-around-the-globe/comment-page-1/#comment-5653</link>
		<dc:creator>income instrument</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3742#comment-5653</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great...It is quit easy to measure the income of United State with the help of map.I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.incomeinstrumentsblog.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;income instruments&lt;/a&gt; consist such type of map to measure the income of the corresponding area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great&#8230;It is quit easy to measure the income of United State with the help of map.I think <a href="http://www.incomeinstrumentsblog.net" rel="nofollow">income instruments</a> consist such type of map to measure the income of the corresponding area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: income instrument</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2010/01/26/the-gini-coefficient-income-inequality-around-the-globe/comment-page-1/#comment-5652</link>
		<dc:creator>income instrument</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3742#comment-5652</guid>
		<description>hvgjhfv mhjfvgjhmn mjfc </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hvgjhfv mhjfvgjhmn mjfc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnivals and Links, Week of January 25th &#8211; Don&#8217;t Quit Your Day Job</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2010/01/26/the-gini-coefficient-income-inequality-around-the-globe/comment-page-1/#comment-3528</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnivals and Links, Week of January 25th &#8211; Don&#8217;t Quit Your Day Job</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3742#comment-3528</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;The Gini Coefficient: Income Inequality Around the Globe&#8221; &#8211; the Weakonomist graphed Gini Coefficients (one measure of income equality) around the globe, and his results are interesting.  The United States has the 45th highest income inequality, from his CIA Factbook link. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;The Gini Coefficient: Income Inequality Around the Globe&#8221; &#8211; the Weakonomist graphed Gini Coefficients (one measure of income equality) around the globe, and his results are interesting.  The United States has the 45th highest income inequality, from his CIA Factbook link. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeanLifeCoach</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2010/01/26/the-gini-coefficient-income-inequality-around-the-globe/comment-page-1/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>LeanLifeCoach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3742#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>If the rich get richer but they are provided an incentive to invest in businesses that employ people, is it all bad?
.-= LeanLifeCoach&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://eliminatethemuda.com/2010/01/if-you-lived-130-years/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;If You Lived 130 Years?&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the rich get richer but they are provided an incentive to invest in businesses that employ people, is it all bad?<br />
.-= LeanLifeCoach&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://eliminatethemuda.com/2010/01/if-you-lived-130-years/" rel="nofollow">If You Lived 130 Years?</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

