<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Money Magazine Doesn’t Understand Banking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/30/money-magazine-doesn%e2%80%99t-understand-banking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/30/money-magazine-doesn%e2%80%99t-understand-banking/</link>
	<description>Everything That&#039;s Wrong With You And Your Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/30/money-magazine-doesn%e2%80%99t-understand-banking/comment-page-1/#comment-3298</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3456#comment-3298</guid>
		<description>Hunh, I recall reading through this article without having quite so much venom.  I pulled out my copy of Money, and lo and behold, the title in the magazine is &#039;If They Built the &lt;i&gt;Perfect&lt;/i&gt; Bank&#039;, which makes the format of the article as a wish list of features make a bit more sense.  Why they decided to change the title for the online feature, I don&#039;t know, but it definitely seems to be worse for the change.
.-= Roger&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/theamateurfinancier/cFiv/~3/86AEaAbrFek/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Carnival of Twenty-Something Finances: Evil Clown Edition&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hunh, I recall reading through this article without having quite so much venom.  I pulled out my copy of Money, and lo and behold, the title in the magazine is &#8216;If They Built the <i>Perfect</i> Bank&#8217;, which makes the format of the article as a wish list of features make a bit more sense.  Why they decided to change the title for the online feature, I don&#8217;t know, but it definitely seems to be worse for the change.<br />
.-= Roger&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/theamateurfinancier/cFiv/~3/86AEaAbrFek/" rel="nofollow">Carnival of Twenty-Something Finances: Evil Clown Edition</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/30/money-magazine-doesn%e2%80%99t-understand-banking/comment-page-1/#comment-3297</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3456#comment-3297</guid>
		<description>Money Magazine is filled with those miserable articles, but it gets worse...next month they&#039;ll highlight a bank that does ALL those things
.-= Evan&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/myjourneytomillions/feed/~3/Q8kLWFEHoj4/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;There were Never Good Ole Days When it Comes to Personal Finance&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money Magazine is filled with those miserable articles, but it gets worse&#8230;next month they&#8217;ll highlight a bank that does ALL those things<br />
.-= Evan&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/myjourneytomillions/feed/~3/Q8kLWFEHoj4/" rel="nofollow">There were Never Good Ole Days When it Comes to Personal Finance</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin M</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/30/money-magazine-doesn%e2%80%99t-understand-banking/comment-page-1/#comment-3296</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3456#comment-3296</guid>
		<description>Terrible article, that is one reason I quit paying for Money.  The other was the &quot;reader profiles&quot; where they talk about the sad stories of people making $150k a year and only having six figures socked away for retirement.  How about profiling families that really need help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrible article, that is one reason I quit paying for Money.  The other was the &#8220;reader profiles&#8221; where they talk about the sad stories of people making $150k a year and only having six figures socked away for retirement.  How about profiling families that really need help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

