<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climategate: The Global Warming Debate Just Got Hotter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/24/climategate-the-global-warming-debate-just-got-hotter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/24/climategate-the-global-warming-debate-just-got-hotter/</link>
	<description>Everything That&#039;s Wrong With You And Your Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:58:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Green Religion of Goremanism &#124; ProgressiveThink.com</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/24/climategate-the-global-warming-debate-just-got-hotter/comment-page-1/#comment-3604</link>
		<dc:creator>The Green Religion of Goremanism &#124; ProgressiveThink.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3408#comment-3604</guid>
		<description>[...] However, the more the Goremans try to suppress the truth, the more the truth comes out. And the unraveling of the phony Goreman religion began with Climategate. &#8220;Thousands of files and emails were stolen and then immediately copied all over the Internet. This is done by the hacker so that the data cannot be recovered once stolen. What has emerged from this is some disturbing conversations from climate scientists. Some of the conversations speak of fudging numbers and questioning measurements that aren’t showing what many would call, the &#8216;green&#8217; agenda.&#8221; &#8211; Climategate: The Global Warming Debate Just Got Hotter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, the more the Goremans try to suppress the truth, the more the truth comes out. And the unraveling of the phony Goreman religion began with Climategate. &#8220;Thousands of files and emails were stolen and then immediately copied all over the Internet. This is done by the hacker so that the data cannot be recovered once stolen. What has emerged from this is some disturbing conversations from climate scientists. Some of the conversations speak of fudging numbers and questioning measurements that aren’t showing what many would call, the &#8216;green&#8217; agenda.&#8221; &#8211; Climategate: The Global Warming Debate Just Got Hotter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/24/climategate-the-global-warming-debate-just-got-hotter/comment-page-1/#comment-3352</link>
		<dc:creator>the weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3408#comment-3352</guid>
		<description>Eddie, &quot;gate&quot; simply means scandal.  This is a scandal.  Whether or not data was faked hardly matters if there was ever a serious discussion about hiding data.  This is manipulating results to fit an agenda.  Either for or against any debate, it&#039;s simply awful to hide data of any kind.  But thanks for your contribution, your feelings on the matter are noted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eddie, &#8220;gate&#8221; simply means scandal.  This is a scandal.  Whether or not data was faked hardly matters if there was ever a serious discussion about hiding data.  This is manipulating results to fit an agenda.  Either for or against any debate, it&#8217;s simply awful to hide data of any kind.  But thanks for your contribution, your feelings on the matter are noted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eddie</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/24/climategate-the-global-warming-debate-just-got-hotter/comment-page-1/#comment-3351</link>
		<dc:creator>eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3408#comment-3351</guid>
		<description>This just out: AP asserts, &quot;Climategate&quot; not a gate type incident at all http://ow.ly/Luxx

You are entitled to your reality, but you are not entitled to your own facts. ooops, you don&#039;t have any - you have feelings. sorry.

over and out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just out: AP asserts, &#8220;Climategate&#8221; not a gate type incident at all <a href="http://ow.ly/Luxx" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/Luxx</a></p>
<p>You are entitled to your reality, but you are not entitled to your own facts. ooops, you don&#8217;t have any &#8211; you have feelings. sorry.</p>
<p>over and out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/24/climategate-the-global-warming-debate-just-got-hotter/comment-page-1/#comment-3348</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3408#comment-3348</guid>
		<description>you have &quot;feelings&quot; about human impact on climate, and you expect anyone to hear what you have say? wait! nevermind... there are plenty of people who use &quot;feelings&quot; for questions like that...

but my personal favorite, and best all around indicator of how out of touch you are, is &quot;always do the thing that best benefits your bottom line, AKA your wallet.&quot;  way to go bud! you will surely die a very happy man...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you have &#8220;feelings&#8221; about human impact on climate, and you expect anyone to hear what you have say? wait! nevermind&#8230; there are plenty of people who use &#8220;feelings&#8221; for questions like that&#8230;</p>
<p>but my personal favorite, and best all around indicator of how out of touch you are, is &#8220;always do the thing that best benefits your bottom line, AKA your wallet.&#8221;  way to go bud! you will surely die a very happy man&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend reading: Countryside retreat</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/24/climategate-the-global-warming-debate-just-got-hotter/comment-page-1/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend reading: Countryside retreat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3408#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>[...] The Climategate debate – Weakanomics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Climategate debate – Weakanomics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/24/climategate-the-global-warming-debate-just-got-hotter/comment-page-1/#comment-3279</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3408#comment-3279</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to know who to believe in this whole Global Warming debate. Do we believe their scientists with their perceived agendas? Do we listen to the other side who are most likely in the pockets of the big oil and energy companies?

I think it&#039;s best to take a mid-line approach. Even if global warming does not turn out to be such a life-threatening issue as we&#039;ve all been told it is still prudent to develop cleaner energy technologies and reduce fossil fuel use and dependence. It makes sense for all of us to try and make as small an impact as possible on the earth and the atmosphere, and if this means paying more for energy, then so be it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to know who to believe in this whole Global Warming debate. Do we believe their scientists with their perceived agendas? Do we listen to the other side who are most likely in the pockets of the big oil and energy companies?</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s best to take a mid-line approach. Even if global warming does not turn out to be such a life-threatening issue as we&#8217;ve all been told it is still prudent to develop cleaner energy technologies and reduce fossil fuel use and dependence. It makes sense for all of us to try and make as small an impact as possible on the earth and the atmosphere, and if this means paying more for energy, then so be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
