<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weakend: The Five Whys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/07/weakend-the-five-whys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/07/weakend-the-five-whys/</link>
	<description>Everything That&#039;s Wrong With You And Your Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bennett</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/07/weakend-the-five-whys/comment-page-1/#comment-3209</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3331#comment-3209</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why? – Mortgage brokers were able to place people into homes they couldn’t normally afford. (fifth why, a root cause)&lt;/i&gt;

I suggest going three levels deeper to get to the true root cause:

6) Why? Because the stock market was valued at three times fair value, adding $12 trillion of funny money to the economy for a few years.

7) Why? Because The Stock-Selling Industry spent millions promoting Buy-and-Hold Investing, the &quot;idea&quot; that there is no need for investors to lower their stock allocations when stock prices get to insanely dangerous levels.

8) Why? Because The Stock-Selling Industry makes hundreds of millions of dollars when middle-class people come to believe that it&#039;s a reasonable idea to put most of their retirement money into stocks even at times when stocks offer a poor long-term value proposition.

Rob
.-= Rob Bennett&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://arichlife.passionsaving.com/2009/11/06/podcast-174-deferred-market-efficiency-what-it-is-what-it-signifies/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Podcast #174 — Deferred Market Efficiency: What It Is, What It Signifies&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why? – Mortgage brokers were able to place people into homes they couldn’t normally afford. (fifth why, a root cause)</i></p>
<p>I suggest going three levels deeper to get to the true root cause:</p>
<p>6) Why? Because the stock market was valued at three times fair value, adding $12 trillion of funny money to the economy for a few years.</p>
<p>7) Why? Because The Stock-Selling Industry spent millions promoting Buy-and-Hold Investing, the &#8220;idea&#8221; that there is no need for investors to lower their stock allocations when stock prices get to insanely dangerous levels.</p>
<p> <img src='http://weakonomics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> Why? Because The Stock-Selling Industry makes hundreds of millions of dollars when middle-class people come to believe that it&#8217;s a reasonable idea to put most of their retirement money into stocks even at times when stocks offer a poor long-term value proposition.</p>
<p>Rob<br />
.-= Rob Bennett&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://arichlife.passionsaving.com/2009/11/06/podcast-174-deferred-market-efficiency-what-it-is-what-it-signifies/" rel="nofollow">Podcast #174 — Deferred Market Efficiency: What It Is, What It Signifies</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadox</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/07/weakend-the-five-whys/comment-page-1/#comment-3208</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3331#comment-3208</guid>
		<description>I agree with the need to be inquisitive and dive to the root cause of things, but I think that in your second example the answers aren&#039;t quite as simple, and I don&#039;t think you hit the root cause. For example, it could be asked why interests went up to begin with or why mortgage brokers could be in a position to sell unaffordable mortgages, or even why folks felt the need to buy houses they couldn&#039;t afford. 

At best your reasoning chain gave you a proximate cause, but in this specific situation I think you got only a small part of a very big and complex picture.
.-= Shadox&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/moneyandsuch/~3/F7WuMlxuiQ0/efficiency-and-effectiveness-in-hunting.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Efficiency and Effectiveness in Hunting for a Job&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the need to be inquisitive and dive to the root cause of things, but I think that in your second example the answers aren&#8217;t quite as simple, and I don&#8217;t think you hit the root cause. For example, it could be asked why interests went up to begin with or why mortgage brokers could be in a position to sell unaffordable mortgages, or even why folks felt the need to buy houses they couldn&#8217;t afford. </p>
<p>At best your reasoning chain gave you a proximate cause, but in this specific situation I think you got only a small part of a very big and complex picture.<br />
.-= Shadox&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/moneyandsuch/~3/F7WuMlxuiQ0/efficiency-and-effectiveness-in-hunting.html" rel="nofollow">Efficiency and Effectiveness in Hunting for a Job</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finances on a 2-Year-Old Level</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/07/weakend-the-five-whys/comment-page-1/#comment-3207</link>
		<dc:creator>Finances on a 2-Year-Old Level</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3331#comment-3207</guid>
		<description>[...] Weakonomist sparked my interest today with this post on how asking &#8220;Why&#8221; five times can usually yield a (not the) root cause of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weakonomist sparked my interest today with this post on how asking &#8220;Why&#8221; five times can usually yield a (not the) root cause of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeanLifeCoach</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/07/weakend-the-five-whys/comment-page-1/#comment-3206</link>
		<dc:creator>LeanLifeCoach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3331#comment-3206</guid>
		<description>Great post and great tool! It actually comes from Lean Management methods and was made famous by Taiichi Ohno of Toyota. 

A couple extra learning points: A) for each answer apply the 5whys. There can be more than one cause that needs to be addressed. B) the myth says 5 why&#039;s is the average, but for your situation you may need to ask more or less times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and great tool! It actually comes from Lean Management methods and was made famous by Taiichi Ohno of Toyota. </p>
<p>A couple extra learning points: A) for each answer apply the 5whys. There can be more than one cause that needs to be addressed. B) the myth says 5 why&#8217;s is the average, but for your situation you may need to ask more or less times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

