<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cap And Trade: Global Warming Solution Or Wall Street Profiteering?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/04/cap-and-trade-global-warming-solution-or-wall-street-profiteering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/04/cap-and-trade-global-warming-solution-or-wall-street-profiteering/</link>
	<description>Everything That&#039;s Wrong With You And Your Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/04/cap-and-trade-global-warming-solution-or-wall-street-profiteering/comment-page-1/#comment-3196</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3311#comment-3196</guid>
		<description>Hi

Market economics is going to sort out the problem with too much carbon in the very near future.  Once the world economy recovers the price of oil will go back to a level where sustainable energy has a chance to compete.
.-= Neil&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://debtadvice4free.com/2009/06/27/the-elusion-of-financial-freedom-that-debt-can-bring/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Elusion of Financial Freedom That Debt Can Bring&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>Market economics is going to sort out the problem with too much carbon in the very near future.  Once the world economy recovers the price of oil will go back to a level where sustainable energy has a chance to compete.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Neil&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://debtadvice4free.com/2009/06/27/the-elusion-of-financial-freedom-that-debt-can-bring/" rel="nofollow">The Elusion of Financial Freedom That Debt Can Bring</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://weakonomics.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Samurai</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/04/cap-and-trade-global-warming-solution-or-wall-street-profiteering/comment-page-1/#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Samurai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3311#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>Ah if only $4+ oil can come back again!  Those were the good times with noticeably less traffic.

I think it&#039;s great if we can tax everything bad, so long as I don&#039;t have to pay for it.  Isn&#039;t that what everybody thinks?
.-= Financial Samurai&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinancialSamurai/~3/y3ROmTJP0ek/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Samurai Mask: An Interview With The CEO of BULLDOG Gin&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah if only $4+ oil can come back again!  Those were the good times with noticeably less traffic.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s great if we can tax everything bad, so long as I don&#8217;t have to pay for it.  Isn&#8217;t that what everybody thinks?<br />
<span class="cluv"> Financial Samurai&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FinancialSamurai/~3/y3ROmTJP0ek/" rel="nofollow">The Samurai Mask: An Interview With The CEO of BULLDOG Gin</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://weakonomics.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/04/cap-and-trade-global-warming-solution-or-wall-street-profiteering/comment-page-1/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>the weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3311#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>Journey, this wasn&#039;t meant to endorse protectionism, merely outline the idea behind the plan for a tariff.  Politically speaking, this would be interpreted as protectionism, but I&#039;m neither endorsing nor advising against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journey, this wasn&#8217;t meant to endorse protectionism, merely outline the idea behind the plan for a tariff.  Politically speaking, this would be interpreted as protectionism, but I&#8217;m neither endorsing nor advising against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/04/cap-and-trade-global-warming-solution-or-wall-street-profiteering/comment-page-1/#comment-3193</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3311#comment-3193</guid>
		<description>&quot;We can’t force China to tax their citizens, but we can tax China. They are reliant on exports to those fat capitalists in America, so we keep American products competitive by placing hefty tariffs on imports to the States.&quot;

From your year or so of writing I&#039;d be shocked if you were for protectionism?
.-= Evan&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/myjourneytomillions/feed/~3/N7bLedDMunY/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How Much Interest do I pay to Financing Companies and Banks? TOO MUCH!&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We can’t force China to tax their citizens, but we can tax China. They are reliant on exports to those fat capitalists in America, so we keep American products competitive by placing hefty tariffs on imports to the States.&#8221;</p>
<p>From your year or so of writing I&#8217;d be shocked if you were for protectionism?<br />
<span class="cluv"> Evan&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/myjourneytomillions/feed/~3/N7bLedDMunY/" rel="nofollow">How Much Interest do I pay to Financing Companies and Banks? TOO MUCH!</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://weakonomics.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Massey</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/11/04/cap-and-trade-global-warming-solution-or-wall-street-profiteering/comment-page-1/#comment-3192</link>
		<dc:creator>Massey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3311#comment-3192</guid>
		<description>Although you make several good points, I think it is naive to assert that the US would be immediately prepared to add a tariff on products made in China and then imported into the U.S. 

China is seen as the next frontier in consumption. US businesses hoping to sell their products in China would fear retribution from a tariff placed on Chinese goods.

The other problem with a Carbon Tax as opposed to a Cap and Trade system is that the tax uses defined incentives (higher prices) to achieve an uncertain outcome (reduced pollution). Alternatively, a Cap and Trade system defines a specific outcome (the amount of pollution allowed) and allows the market to find the correct price. Clearly achieving a definitive outcome is better and using the market to set a price is better. 

As for the Wall Street profiteering. Yes, that will happen. That&#039;s what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although you make several good points, I think it is naive to assert that the US would be immediately prepared to add a tariff on products made in China and then imported into the U.S. </p>
<p>China is seen as the next frontier in consumption. US businesses hoping to sell their products in China would fear retribution from a tariff placed on Chinese goods.</p>
<p>The other problem with a Carbon Tax as opposed to a Cap and Trade system is that the tax uses defined incentives (higher prices) to achieve an uncertain outcome (reduced pollution). Alternatively, a Cap and Trade system defines a specific outcome (the amount of pollution allowed) and allows the market to find the correct price. Clearly achieving a definitive outcome is better and using the market to set a price is better. </p>
<p>As for the Wall Street profiteering. Yes, that will happen. That&#8217;s what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
