<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weakon 238: Stock Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weakonomics.com/2009/10/09/weakon-238-stock-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/10/09/weakon-238-stock-beta/</link>
	<description>Everything That&#039;s Wrong With You And Your Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sim</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/10/09/weakon-238-stock-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-5738</link>
		<dc:creator>Sim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3177#comment-5738</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re interested, there&#039;s an Excel spreadsheet to help you calculate beta at http://investexcel.net/367/calculate-stock-beta-with-excel/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re interested, there&#8217;s an Excel spreadsheet to help you calculate beta at <a href="http://investexcel.net/367/calculate-stock-beta-with-excel/" rel="nofollow">http://investexcel.net/367/calculate-stock-beta-with-excel/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Cat Investing and Economics Carnival #5 at Curious Cat Investing and Economics Blog</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/10/09/weakon-238-stock-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-3164</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Cat Investing and Economics Carnival #5 at Curious Cat Investing and Economics Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3177#comment-3164</guid>
		<description>[...] Weakon 238: Stock Beta by Philip &#8211; &#8221; If the beta comes back 1 or higher then you are relying on the market for your returns and are not protected against a down market. That isn’t a bad thing if you’re tolerant to risk, the beta on my 401(k) is 1.3.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weakon 238: Stock Beta by Philip &#8211; &#8221; If the beta comes back 1 or higher then you are relying on the market for your returns and are not protected against a down market. That isn’t a bad thing if you’re tolerant to risk, the beta on my 401(k) is 1.3.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Roundup - Great Personal Finance Articles This Week From The Fantasy Baseball League</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/10/09/weakon-238-stock-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-3106</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Roundup - Great Personal Finance Articles This Week From The Fantasy Baseball League</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3177#comment-3106</guid>
		<description>[...] Stock Beta - Weakonomics (A great subject that many investors do not understand, but you should!) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stock Beta &#8211; Weakonomics (A great subject that many investors do not understand, but you should!) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Samurai</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/10/09/weakon-238-stock-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-3098</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Samurai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3177#comment-3098</guid>
		<description>Do you minds writing us an update on Alpha?  Thnx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you minds writing us an update on Alpha?  Thnx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bennett</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/10/09/weakon-238-stock-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-3097</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=3177#comment-3097</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Beta is an amazing tool for investors, even those of us just looking at our retirement portfolios. &lt;/i&gt;

I mean no personal offense, but I think it is pure silliness.

If you buy stocks at good prices, you will do well in the long term. If you buy stocks at poor prices, you will do poorly in the long term.

If you spend too much of your time looking at things like beta, you are more likely to take your eye off the ball and persuade yourself that there is some justification for ignoring price.

Lots of people who study things like beta until their eyes bleed don&#039;t possess a strong understanding of how stock investing works, in my assessment. My view is that this is the sort of thing that looks good on chalkboards but doesn&#039;t pay off in the real world.

Rob
.-= Rob Bennett&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://arichlife.passionsaving.com/2009/10/09/podcast-162-i-was-wrong-there-is-no-equity-risk-premium/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Podcast #162 — I Was Wrong: There Is No Equity Risk Premium&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Beta is an amazing tool for investors, even those of us just looking at our retirement portfolios. </i></p>
<p>I mean no personal offense, but I think it is pure silliness.</p>
<p>If you buy stocks at good prices, you will do well in the long term. If you buy stocks at poor prices, you will do poorly in the long term.</p>
<p>If you spend too much of your time looking at things like beta, you are more likely to take your eye off the ball and persuade yourself that there is some justification for ignoring price.</p>
<p>Lots of people who study things like beta until their eyes bleed don&#8217;t possess a strong understanding of how stock investing works, in my assessment. My view is that this is the sort of thing that looks good on chalkboards but doesn&#8217;t pay off in the real world.</p>
<p>Rob<br />
.-= Rob Bennett&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://arichlife.passionsaving.com/2009/10/09/podcast-162-i-was-wrong-there-is-no-equity-risk-premium/" rel="nofollow">Podcast #162 — I Was Wrong: There Is No Equity Risk Premium</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

