<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weakend: Obama Has Mad Skills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weakonomics.com/2009/06/20/weakend-obama-has-mad-skills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/06/20/weakend-obama-has-mad-skills/</link>
	<description>Everything That&#039;s Wrong With You And Your Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:49:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Incidental Economist</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/06/20/weakend-obama-has-mad-skills/comment-page-1/#comment-2534</link>
		<dc:creator>The Incidental Economist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=2369#comment-2534</guid>
		<description>OK, you like him, I like him. Is our affinity based only on the superficial? I think some of it is. He says things I like in ways I like to hear them. That&#039;s what a good politician does.

Is our affinity based on deeper things? For me, yes. He&#039;s attempting to tackle important problems that I feel need to be addressed. He&#039;s not doing them in exactly the way I&#039;d like, but he can&#039;t. He&#039;s not a king and he has to balance competing interests.

It is still early in his presidency. Obama&#039;s legacy has yet to be written. The next six to nine months will reveal if he can deliver on some big ticket items: health care, financial regulation, energy reform. I think the changes for meaningful progress in those areas are good, mediocre, and poor, respectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, you like him, I like him. Is our affinity based only on the superficial? I think some of it is. He says things I like in ways I like to hear them. That&#8217;s what a good politician does.</p>
<p>Is our affinity based on deeper things? For me, yes. He&#8217;s attempting to tackle important problems that I feel need to be addressed. He&#8217;s not doing them in exactly the way I&#8217;d like, but he can&#8217;t. He&#8217;s not a king and he has to balance competing interests.</p>
<p>It is still early in his presidency. Obama&#8217;s legacy has yet to be written. The next six to nine months will reveal if he can deliver on some big ticket items: health care, financial regulation, energy reform. I think the changes for meaningful progress in those areas are good, mediocre, and poor, respectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/06/20/weakend-obama-has-mad-skills/comment-page-1/#comment-2515</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=2369#comment-2515</guid>
		<description>Actually doing nothing is sometimes better than doing something. Do you remember the depression of 1921? No? That&#039;s because Harding did nothing and the market corrected within a year. How long did the depression in 1929 last? What was the difference between the two?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually doing nothing is sometimes better than doing something. Do you remember the depression of 1921? No? That&#8217;s because Harding did nothing and the market corrected within a year. How long did the depression in 1929 last? What was the difference between the two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadox</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/06/20/weakend-obama-has-mad-skills/comment-page-1/#comment-2509</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=2369#comment-2509</guid>
		<description>I too had some doubt about the man early on in the election cycle and then was converted. I now think that the man is excellent. He is doing a great job, and doing it calmly in rough seas.

I too don&#039;t agree with him on everything, but it would be unreasonable to assume that I would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too had some doubt about the man early on in the election cycle and then was converted. I now think that the man is excellent. He is doing a great job, and doing it calmly in rough seas.</p>
<p>I too don&#8217;t agree with him on everything, but it would be unreasonable to assume that I would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
