<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six Lessons Star Trek Can Teach You About Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weakonomics.com/2009/05/13/six-lessons-star-trek-can-you-about-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/05/13/six-lessons-star-trek-can-you-about-money/</link>
	<description>Everything That&#039;s Wrong With You And Your Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:54:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/05/13/six-lessons-star-trek-can-you-about-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2321</link>
		<dc:creator>the weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1948#comment-2321</guid>
		<description>Tom, 

You&#039;re absolutely right about the CMO  position on a star ship.  They are responsible for the overall health of the crew, and it would not be uncommon for the doctor to review the latest completed mission with captain, which would coincide with the end of each episode of TOS in which Bones was on the bridge joking around with the crew.  At that the CMO might also work with the captain to prepare for the next mission, making his presence on the bridge legitimized.  Here is what the Star Trek Wiki has to say about CMOs - http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Chief_medical_officer 

Of course that all being said, the fact that I made a post linking Star Trek to money and then commented that someone was robbing the entertainment value of the post points out to most readers that no one should try to formulate an opinion on health care based on the post.  Only those of us sharp as a bowling ball would be offended by anything in this post. 

You&#039;re obviously passionate about the health care subject however I believe you have chosen the wrong forum in which to express yourself.  This was a joke, and in the words of Family Guy I pronounce you Buzz Killington http://familyguy.wikia.com/wiki/Buzz_Killington 

Thanks everyone for the comments, but since now the entertainment value of this post is completely robbed I&#039;m closing the comments.  If you have something else to say, please email me at philip *at* thisdomain *dot* com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, </p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right about the CMO  position on a star ship.  They are responsible for the overall health of the crew, and it would not be uncommon for the doctor to review the latest completed mission with captain, which would coincide with the end of each episode of TOS in which Bones was on the bridge joking around with the crew.  At that the CMO might also work with the captain to prepare for the next mission, making his presence on the bridge legitimized.  Here is what the Star Trek Wiki has to say about CMOs &#8211; <a href="http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Chief_medical_officer" rel="nofollow">http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Chief_medical_officer</a> </p>
<p>Of course that all being said, the fact that I made a post linking Star Trek to money and then commented that someone was robbing the entertainment value of the post points out to most readers that no one should try to formulate an opinion on health care based on the post.  Only those of us sharp as a bowling ball would be offended by anything in this post. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re obviously passionate about the health care subject however I believe you have chosen the wrong forum in which to express yourself.  This was a joke, and in the words of Family Guy I pronounce you Buzz Killington <a href="http://familyguy.wikia.com/wiki/Buzz_Killington" rel="nofollow">http://familyguy.wikia.com/wiki/Buzz_Killington</a> </p>
<p>Thanks everyone for the comments, but since now the entertainment value of this post is completely robbed I&#8217;m closing the comments.  If you have something else to say, please email me at philip *at* thisdomain *dot* com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Clarke</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/05/13/six-lessons-star-trek-can-you-about-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2316</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1948#comment-2316</guid>
		<description>&quot;Really? That’s amazing! I had no idea. Would anyone else like to try and rob the entertainment value from this post?&quot;
Well, alright, as you asked.


What you&#039;ve said, if taken as anything more than a joke, could be seen as unbelievably offensive to some of the hardest working people in public service. While private doctors often work 9 to 5, and then head out for some golf because they&#039;ve earned their paycheque, leaving the hospital trust doctors to provide night shift care, free-at-point of-service doctors work longer hours, generally for less money per hour. They do more on call work, they have to deal with more paperwork, they can&#039;t cherry-pick their patients, and overall they work harder than you can possibly imagine.
And if the Enterprise wasn&#039;t free-at-point-of-service work, once they&#039;d performed the most basic stabilisation of a patient, they&#039;d have to check his insurance before letting him recover. And if it wasn&#039;t up to snuff, they&#039;d chuck him out the airlock. Ironically, in any sea vessel is the one place where people ABSOLUTELY believe in &quot;free-at-point-of-service&quot;.

Your statement promotes a fallacy about reward-based economics that&#039;s pretty ridiculous &quot;Oh, well if people who don&#039;t care get paid, they do more&quot;; a statement YOU attack with your final point, and which has been proven time and time again to be fallacious by economic studies, and is usually replaced with &quot;If people who don&#039;t care get paid, they do just enough to get paid.&quot; How would McCoy being in Sickbay studying affect his paycheque? *All* doctors have to study just to keep their licence to practice, financial motivators have nothing to do with it.

And on top of all that, if you knew anything about hospitals, you&#039;d know that the Chief of Medicine spends far less time with patients than most doctors, because his job is to liase with the shareholders/administrators, so he can better prepare and support his staff to do their job. So actually, McCoy&#039;s hanging out on the bridge is actually him ensuring he&#039;s aware of what will be coming up that he needs to be ready for, and ensuring Jim&#039;s aware of Medical&#039;s needs.

Weakonomics indeed. Good day, sir. I SAID GOOD DAY!



Beat that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Really? That’s amazing! I had no idea. Would anyone else like to try and rob the entertainment value from this post?&#8221;<br />
Well, alright, as you asked.</p>
<p>What you&#8217;ve said, if taken as anything more than a joke, could be seen as unbelievably offensive to some of the hardest working people in public service. While private doctors often work 9 to 5, and then head out for some golf because they&#8217;ve earned their paycheque, leaving the hospital trust doctors to provide night shift care, free-at-point of-service doctors work longer hours, generally for less money per hour. They do more on call work, they have to deal with more paperwork, they can&#8217;t cherry-pick their patients, and overall they work harder than you can possibly imagine.<br />
And if the Enterprise wasn&#8217;t free-at-point-of-service work, once they&#8217;d performed the most basic stabilisation of a patient, they&#8217;d have to check his insurance before letting him recover. And if it wasn&#8217;t up to snuff, they&#8217;d chuck him out the airlock. Ironically, in any sea vessel is the one place where people ABSOLUTELY believe in &#8220;free-at-point-of-service&#8221;.</p>
<p>Your statement promotes a fallacy about reward-based economics that&#8217;s pretty ridiculous &#8220;Oh, well if people who don&#8217;t care get paid, they do more&#8221;; a statement YOU attack with your final point, and which has been proven time and time again to be fallacious by economic studies, and is usually replaced with &#8220;If people who don&#8217;t care get paid, they do just enough to get paid.&#8221; How would McCoy being in Sickbay studying affect his paycheque? *All* doctors have to study just to keep their licence to practice, financial motivators have nothing to do with it.</p>
<p>And on top of all that, if you knew anything about hospitals, you&#8217;d know that the Chief of Medicine spends far less time with patients than most doctors, because his job is to liase with the shareholders/administrators, so he can better prepare and support his staff to do their job. So actually, McCoy&#8217;s hanging out on the bridge is actually him ensuring he&#8217;s aware of what will be coming up that he needs to be ready for, and ensuring Jim&#8217;s aware of Medical&#8217;s needs.</p>
<p>Weakonomics indeed. Good day, sir. I SAID GOOD DAY!</p>
<p>Beat that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnival of Personal Finance # 206: The Memorial Day Stars and Stripes Edition &#124; Greener Pastures: Personal Finance</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/05/13/six-lessons-star-trek-can-you-about-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2284</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnival of Personal Finance # 206: The Memorial Day Stars and Stripes Edition &#124; Greener Pastures: Personal Finance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 10:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1948#comment-2284</guid>
		<description>[...] The Weakonomist from Weakonomics presents Six Lessons Star Trek Can Teach You About Money. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Weakonomist from Weakonomics presents Six Lessons Star Trek Can Teach You About Money. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weakonomics Subscriber Swap &#124; Financial Independence in Your 20s &#124; Studenomics</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/05/13/six-lessons-star-trek-can-you-about-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2282</link>
		<dc:creator>Weakonomics Subscriber Swap &#124; Financial Independence in Your 20s &#124; Studenomics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 15:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1948#comment-2282</guid>
		<description>[...] as a college student and about the transition into the real world. Please take a moment to read 6 lessons Star Trek can teach you about money and why text messaging is the biggest scam. Once again please give Weakonomics a chance for at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as a college student and about the transition into the real world. Please take a moment to read 6 lessons Star Trek can teach you about money and why text messaging is the biggest scam. Once again please give Weakonomics a chance for at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monroe on a Budget &#187; Weakonomics: Six lessons Star Trek can teach you about money</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/05/13/six-lessons-star-trek-can-you-about-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2243</link>
		<dc:creator>Monroe on a Budget &#187; Weakonomics: Six lessons Star Trek can teach you about money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 10:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1948#comment-2243</guid>
		<description>[...] I bring you Weakonomics&#8217; Six lessons Star Trek can teach you about money. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I bring you Weakonomics&#8217; Six lessons Star Trek can teach you about money. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/05/13/six-lessons-star-trek-can-you-about-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1948#comment-2230</guid>
		<description>&quot;Precious Metals Always Carry A Value&quot;

Last I heard, dilithium crystals are also fetching a good price now.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mike&#8217;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://guzzothecontrarian.com/2009/05/15/variable-annuities-a-review/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Variable Annuities - A Review&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Precious Metals Always Carry A Value&#8221;</p>
<p>Last I heard, dilithium crystals are also fetching a good price now.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Mike&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://guzzothecontrarian.com/2009/05/15/variable-annuities-a-review/" rel="nofollow">Variable Annuities &#8211; A Review</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/05/13/six-lessons-star-trek-can-you-about-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>The Weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1948#comment-2213</guid>
		<description>Really? That&#039;s amazing!  I had no idea. Would anyone else like to try and rob the entertainment value from this post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? That&#8217;s amazing!  I had no idea. Would anyone else like to try and rob the entertainment value from this post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prufock</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/05/13/six-lessons-star-trek-can-you-about-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2212</link>
		<dc:creator>prufock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1948#comment-2212</guid>
		<description>You do know that doctors in tax-funded healthcare systems still get paid, right? Pretty generously at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do know that doctors in tax-funded healthcare systems still get paid, right? Pretty generously at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/05/13/six-lessons-star-trek-can-you-about-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1948#comment-2209</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed this post since I&#039;m a Trekker from way back.
MJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this post since I&#8217;m a Trekker from way back.<br />
MJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/05/13/six-lessons-star-trek-can-you-about-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2207</link>
		<dc:creator>The Weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1948#comment-2207</guid>
		<description>Good catch on the title, that stuff always escapes me for some reason, fixed now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good catch on the title, that stuff always escapes me for some reason, fixed now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
