<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Income Tax: The Pros and Cons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weakonomics.com/2009/03/24/income-tax-the-pros-and-cons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/03/24/income-tax-the-pros-and-cons/</link>
	<description>Everything That&#039;s Wrong With You And Your Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PF Blog Spotlight: Weakonomics &#124; The Amateur Financier</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/03/24/income-tax-the-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1861</link>
		<dc:creator>PF Blog Spotlight: Weakonomics &#124; The Amateur Financier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1351#comment-1861</guid>
		<description>[...] Week - The Weakonomist spent an entire week covering different methods of taxation, including the income tax, the &#8216;Fair Tax&#8217;, and the Value Added Tax (VAT), which I&#8217;ll admit I didn&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Week &#8211; The Weakonomist spent an entire week covering different methods of taxation, including the income tax, the &#8216;Fair Tax&#8217;, and the Value Added Tax (VAT), which I&#8217;ll admit I didn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/03/24/income-tax-the-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1817</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1351#comment-1817</guid>
		<description>&quot;When you make $10,000, you might pay 5%, but if you make $100,000, you might pay 30%.&quot;
While you could say something like this is correct (if you&#039;re talking about the effective tax rate on gross income), isn&#039;t it sort of glossing over the whole mechanism of progressive tax?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When you make $10,000, you might pay 5%, but if you make $100,000, you might pay 30%.&#8221;<br />
While you could say something like this is correct (if you&#8217;re talking about the effective tax rate on gross income), isn&#8217;t it sort of glossing over the whole mechanism of progressive tax?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #035 &#8212; Links O&#8217; The Week &#124; MyMoneyMinute.com</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/03/24/income-tax-the-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1802</link>
		<dc:creator>#035 &#8212; Links O&#8217; The Week &#124; MyMoneyMinute.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1351#comment-1802</guid>
		<description>[...] gives us The Pros and Cons of the Income Tax, with a great link to a graph of the world&#8217;s income tax [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gives us The Pros and Cons of the Income Tax, with a great link to a graph of the world&#8217;s income tax [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/03/24/income-tax-the-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1750</link>
		<dc:creator>the weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1351#comment-1750</guid>
		<description>@SJ, I like your argument about how the rich should feel obligated to pay more to keep us poor folks off their backs.  John Galt wouldn&#039;t agree, but Galt is an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SJ, I like your argument about how the rich should feel obligated to pay more to keep us poor folks off their backs.  John Galt wouldn&#8217;t agree, but Galt is an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/03/24/income-tax-the-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1749</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1351#comment-1749</guid>
		<description>I personally do think that the rich should progressively pay more but not as an income tax. I&#039;d be happy if income tax were replaced with a substantial VAT that taxed consumption instead. The rich could still pay for private jets and arm candy but would pay a large VAT for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally do think that the rich should progressively pay more but not as an income tax. I&#8217;d be happy if income tax were replaced with a substantial VAT that taxed consumption instead. The rich could still pay for private jets and arm candy but would pay a large VAT for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJ</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/03/24/income-tax-the-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator>SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1351#comment-1744</guid>
		<description>I think I read two &quot;pseudo-arguments&quot; both pro and con.

One was that the rich should feel obliged to pay more or well... us poor hungry bums would be more apt to revolt and what not; such as gold ole Europe. So they should pay more so the govt. can help em out heh...
Not sure how great that analogy is...

Also, the question would be who takes advantage of more services of the government?  I &#039;ve had mixed thoughts on this part... whether the poor take advantage of more services or the infrastructure favors the rich more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I read two &#8220;pseudo-arguments&#8221; both pro and con.</p>
<p>One was that the rich should feel obliged to pay more or well&#8230; us poor hungry bums would be more apt to revolt and what not; such as gold ole Europe. So they should pay more so the govt. can help em out heh&#8230;<br />
Not sure how great that analogy is&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, the question would be who takes advantage of more services of the government?  I &#8216;ve had mixed thoughts on this part&#8230; whether the poor take advantage of more services or the infrastructure favors the rich more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topics about Economy &#187; Archive &#187; Income Tax: The Pros and Cons</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/03/24/income-tax-the-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1743</link>
		<dc:creator>Topics about Economy &#187; Archive &#187; Income Tax: The Pros and Cons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1351#comment-1743</guid>
		<description>[...] Weakonomi&#194;&#162;s put an intriguing blog post on Income Tax: The Pros and ConsHere&#8217;s a quick excerptWelcome to our current system of taxation.  You know the simple process of picking dependents, spouses, claimants, merchants, clergy, politicians, hobbits, muggles, bigots, tempests, magistrates, and pets that all qualify you for various tax breaks.  Of course you pay a certain tax based on how much money you make.  Most states also make you pay taxes based on how much money you make as well.  It’s so simple that there is not an entire industry employing millions devoted to it.  Oh wait… The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weakonomi&Acirc;&cent;s put an intriguing blog post on Income Tax: The Pros and ConsHere&#8217;s a quick excerptWelcome to our current system of taxation.  You know the simple process of picking dependents, spouses, claimants, merchants, clergy, politicians, hobbits, muggles, bigots, tempests, magistrates, and pets that all qualify you for various tax breaks.  Of course you pay a certain tax based on how much money you make.  Most states also make you pay taxes based on how much money you make as well.  It’s so simple that there is not an entire industry employing millions devoted to it.  Oh wait… The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topics about Dogs and Life with Pets &#187; Income Tax: The Pros and Cons</title>
		<link>http://weakonomics.com/2009/03/24/income-tax-the-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1742</link>
		<dc:creator>Topics about Dogs and Life with Pets &#187; Income Tax: The Pros and Cons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weakonomics.com/?p=1351#comment-1742</guid>
		<description>[...] Weakonomi&#194;&#162;s placed an interesting blog post on Income Tax: The Pros and ConsHere&#8217;s a brief overviewWelcome to our current system of taxation.  You know the simple process of picking dependents, spouses, claimants, merchants, clergy, politicians, hobbits, muggles, bigots, tempests, magistrates, and pets that all qualify you for various tax breaks.  Of course you pay a certain tax based on how much money you make.  Most states also make you pay taxes based on how much money you make as well.  It’s so simple that there is not an entire industry employing millions devoted to it.  Oh wait… The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weakonomi&Acirc;&cent;s placed an interesting blog post on Income Tax: The Pros and ConsHere&#8217;s a brief overviewWelcome to our current system of taxation.  You know the simple process of picking dependents, spouses, claimants, merchants, clergy, politicians, hobbits, muggles, bigots, tempests, magistrates, and pets that all qualify you for various tax breaks.  Of course you pay a certain tax based on how much money you make.  Most states also make you pay taxes based on how much money you make as well.  It’s so simple that there is not an entire industry employing millions devoted to it.  Oh wait… The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

